Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Betty Chenier
This text of Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Betty Chenier (Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Betty Chenier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Betty Chenier, et al.
Appellate case number: 01-21-00073-CV
Trial court case number: 2020-10063
Trial court: 152nd District Court of Harris County
Appellant’s, Union Pacific Railroad Company, counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel in this case. Union Pacific has consented to the motion to withdraw, and Appellees do not oppose the motion. Baker Botts LLP and its attorneys Gavin R. Villareal and Maddy R. Dwertman have entered appearances as Union Pacific’s new counsel. The motion to withdraw is granted. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: _______/s/ Sarah Beth Landau________________________________ Acting individually
Date: _December 16, 2021_________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Betty Chenier, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-pacific-railroad-company-v-betty-chenier-texapp-2021.