Union Cty. Park Comm. v. Cty. of Union
This text of 381 A.2d 33 (Union Cty. Park Comm. v. Cty. of Union) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE UNION COUNTY PARK COMMISSION, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE COUNTY OF UNION, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT,
v.
THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-INTERVENOR.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges LYNCH, MILMED and ANTELL.
Mr. Richard R. Width argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Lindabury, McCormick & Estabrook, attorneys).
Mr. William J. McCloud, County Counsel, argued the cause for respondent County of Union.
Mrs. Frances Lawrence Antonin, Assistant County Counsel, argued the cause for intervenor County of Hudson (Mr. Harold J. Ruvoldt, Jr., Hudson County Counsel, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The order of June 17, 1976 under review is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Feller in his opinion, 154 N.J. Super. 213 (Law Div. 1976).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
381 A.2d 33, 154 N.J. Super. 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-cty-park-comm-v-cty-of-union-njsuperctappdiv-1977.