Union Cty. Park Comm. v. Cty. of Union
Opinion
THE UNION COUNTY PARK COMMISSION, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE COUNTY OF UNION, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT,
v.
THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-INTERVENOR.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges LYNCH, MILMED and ANTELL.
Mr. Richard R. Width argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Lindabury, McCormick & Estabrook, attorneys).
Mr. William J. McCloud, County Counsel, argued the cause for respondent County of Union.
Mrs. Frances Lawrence Antonin, Assistant County Counsel, argued the cause for intervenor County of Hudson (Mr. Harold J. Ruvoldt, Jr., Hudson County Counsel, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The order of June 17, 1976 under review is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Feller in his opinion, 154 N.J. Super. 213 (Law Div. 1976).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
381 A.2d 33 (Union Cty. Park Comm. v. Cty. of Union) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.