State v. Schumm
381 A.2d 33, 75 N.J. 199, 1978 N.J. LEXIS 129
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, 146 N. J. Super. 30.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford, Schreiber and Handler — 7.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Schumm, 381 A.2d 33, 75 N.J. 199, 1978 N.J. LEXIS 129 (N.J. 1978).
381 A.2d 33 (State v. Schumm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
New Jersey Natural Gas Company v. Borough of Red Bank and Red Bank Rivercenter Special Improvement District
102 A.3d 1202 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014)
Perrelli v. Pastorelle
20 A.3d 354 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011)
Committee v. TWIN RIVERS HOMEOWNERS'ASSOCIATION
890 A.2d 947 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2006)
State v. Hayducka
766 A.2d 813 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
State v. David
671 A.2d 195 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)