Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Crouch
200 S.E. 356, 189 S.C. 57, 1938 S.C. LEXIS 199
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
We think that the conclusions reached by his Honor, Judge Gaston, are correct, and we approve the result of his decree. If this is a suit in equity in all of its prominent features and purposes, as it is, “it draws within the jurisdiction in which it is heard all questions arising therein and incidental thereto.” Sale v. Meggett, 25 S. C., 72.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Crouch, 200 S.E. 356, 189 S.C. 57, 1938 S.C. LEXIS 199 (S.C. 1938).
200 S.E. 356 (Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Crouch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DuPont v. Southern National Bank
342 S.E.2d 590 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1986)