DuPont v. Southern National Bank

342 S.E.2d 590, 288 S.C. 312, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 322
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 31, 1986·No. 22515·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gregory, Justice:

Respondent commenced this action to set aside several [313]*313deeds alleging mistake in conveyances to a trust.1 Appellants moved for the case to be transferred to the jury roster. This appeal is from the denial of that motion. We affirm.

In an action to set aside a deed, a party’s right to a jury trial is determined by whether the dispute raises legal or equitable issues. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Crouch, 189 S. C. 57, 200 S. E. 356 (1938). Respondent’s complaint, although poorly drafted, raises a simple question — whether respondent was mistaken in his conveyances to the trust. This Court, through long-established precedent, has recognized that an action alleging mistake is in equity. See Turner v. Washington Realty Co., 128 S. C. 271, 122 S. E. 768 (1924).2 Therefore, the trial judge properly denied appellants’ motion.

Affirmed.

Ness, C. J., and Harwell, Chandler and Finney, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DuPont v. Southern National Bank, 342 S.E.2d 590, 288 S.C. 312, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 322 (S.C. 1986).

342 S.E.2d 590 (DuPont v. Southern National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Estate of Holden
539 S.E.2d 703 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2000)