DuPont v. Southern National Bank
This text of 342 S.E.2d 590 (DuPont v. Southern National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent commenced this action to set aside several [313]*313deeds alleging mistake in conveyances to a trust.1 Appellants moved for the case to be transferred to the jury roster. This appeal is from the denial of that motion. We affirm.
In an action to set aside a deed, a party’s right to a jury trial is determined by whether the dispute raises legal or equitable issues. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Crouch, 189 S. C. 57, 200 S. E. 356 (1938). Respondent’s complaint, although poorly drafted, raises a simple question — whether respondent was mistaken in his conveyances to the trust. This Court, through long-established precedent, has recognized that an action alleging mistake is in equity. See Turner v. Washington Realty Co., 128 S. C. 271, 122 S. E. 768 (1924).2 Therefore, the trial judge properly denied appellants’ motion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
342 S.E.2d 590, 288 S.C. 312, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dupont-v-southern-national-bank-sc-1986.