Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.

434 F.3d 1357
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 10, 2006·No. 2004-1475·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

SUE L. ROBINSON, Chief Judge.

ORDER

A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en bane was filed by the Appellants1, and a response thereto was [1358]*1358invited by the court and filed by the Cross Appellants. The petition for rehearing was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc, amici curiae briefs and response were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for panel rehearing is denied.
(2) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
(3) The mandate of the court will issue on January 17, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corp. v. Shell Oil Co., 434 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

434 F.3d 1357 (Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ormco Corp. v. Align Technology, Inc.
609 F. Supp. 2d 1057 (C.D. California, 2009)