Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.

434 F.3d 1357
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJanuary 10, 2006
Docket2004-1475
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 434 F.3d 1357 (Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corp. v. Shell Oil Co., 434 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

SUE L. ROBINSON, Chief Judge.

ORDER

A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en bane was filed by the Appellants1, and a response thereto was [1358]*1358invited by the court and filed by the Cross Appellants. The petition for rehearing was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc, amici curiae briefs and response were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for panel rehearing is denied.
(2) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
(3) The mandate of the court will issue on January 17, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ormco Corp. v. Align Technology, Inc.
609 F. Supp. 2d 1057 (C.D. California, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
434 F.3d 1357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-carbide-chemicals-plastics-technology-corp-v-shell-oil-co-cafc-2006.