Uma Iron & Steel Co. v. United States

46 F. Supp. 2d 1050, 23 Ct. Int'l Trade 214, 46 F. Supp. 2d 1051, 23 C.I.T. 213, 21 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1446, 1999 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 25

• Court: United States Court of International Trade
• Decided: April 1, 1999
• Docket: Consol. 91-11-00825
• Status: Published

Opinion

46 F.Supp.2d 1050 (1999)

UMA IRON & STEEL CO., et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant.

Slip Op. 99-30. Court No. 91-11-00825.

United States Court of International Trade.

April 1, 1999.

JUDGMENT ORDER

DiCARLO, Senior Judge.

The United States Department of Commerce submitted its Results of Redetermination in accordance with this Court's Remand order of May 13, 1994, in the case of Uma Iron and Steel Co., et al. v. United States, Consolidated Court No. 91-11-00825. The Department of Commerce requested this remand pursuant to the remand from the Court in Creswell Trading Company, Inc., et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 91-01-00012, Slip Op. 98-87. In its Redetermination of the 1988 administrative review, Commerce recalculated the company-specific subsidy rates by revising the rates relating to India's International Price Reimbursement Scheme (IPRS). The rates, however, did not change. Accordingly, the rates applicable to the 1988 period of review are as follows:

   Uma Iron & Steel Co.  10.03%
   Govind Steel          14.08%
   All Others             4.10%

These rates have been stipulated to and accepted by all parties to this action.

The Court having reviewed the Redetermination Results, Commerce having complied with the Court's Remand, and the parties having stipulated to the rates, it is hereby.

ORDERED that the Redetermination Results are affirmed; and it is further.

ORDERED that the rates listed above shall be the rates for the 1988 period, and it is further.

ORDERED that, as the parties have stipulated that they will not litigate any other issues, this action is dismissed.