Uma Iron & Steel Co. v. United States

46 F. Supp. 2d 1050
United States Court of International Trade·Decided April 1, 1999·No. Slip Op. 99-30; Court No. 91-11-00825·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[1051]*1051JUDGMENT ORDER

DiCARLO, Senior Judge:

The United States Department of Commerce submitted its Results of Redetermi-nation in accordance with this Court’s Remand order of May 13, 1994, in the case of Uma Iron and Steel Co., et al. v. United States, Consolidated Court No. 91—11— 00825. The Department of Commerce requested this remand pursuant to the remand from the Court in Creswell Trading Company, Inc., et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 91-01-00012, Slip Op. 98-87. In its Redetermination of the 1988 administrative review, Commerce recalculated the company-specific subsidy rates by revising the rates relating to India’s International Price Reimbursement Scheme (IPRS). The rates, however, did not change. Accordingly, the rates applicable to the 1988 period of review are as follows:

Uma Iron & Steel Co. 10.03%
Govind Steel 14.08%
All Others 4.10%

These rates have been stipulated to and accepted by all parties to this action.

The Court having reviewed the Redeter-mination Results, Commerce having complied with the Court’s Remand, and the parties having stipulated to the rates, it is hereby.

ORDERED that the Redetermination Results are affirmed; and it is further.

ORDERED that the rates listed above shall be the rates for the 1988 period, and it is further.

ORDERED that, as the parties have stipulated that they will not litigate any other issues, this action is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Uma Iron & Steel Co. v. United States, 46 F. Supp. 2d 1050 (cit 1999).

46 F. Supp. 2d 1050 (Uma Iron & Steel Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Uma Iron & Steel Co. v. United States
46 F. Supp. 2d 1050 (Court of International Trade, 1999)