Ultsch v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 30, 2020·No. 7:19-cv-10703·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TIMOTHY JAMES ULTSCH, Petitioner, 19 CIVIL 10703 (VB) -against- JUDGMENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated November 30, 2020, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. A federal prisoner seeking habeas relief under Section 2241 need not obtain a certificate of appealability to take an appeal. See Murphy v. United States, 199 F.3d 599, 601 n.2 (2d Cir. 1999). However, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444- 45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. DATED: New York, New York November 30, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court

Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ultsch v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Ultsch v. United States (Ultsch v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
John Evangelist (Thomas) Murphy v. United States
199 F.3d 599 (Second Circuit, 1999)