Ulster Electric Supply Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
283 N.E.2d 622, 30 N.Y.2d 712, 332 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1373
Opinions
The letter, dated November 16, 1967, sent by the plaintiff to the defendant general contractor — in which it announced that “ [w]e are therefore proceeding with a lien against [the] job ” —may not be regarded as the notice which section 137 of the State Finance Law requires as a condition precedent to an action on the general contractor’s payment bond by a person who furnishes materials to a subcontractor. We pass on no other question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ulster Electric Supply Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 283 N.E.2d 622, 30 N.Y.2d 712, 332 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1373 (N.Y. 1972).
283 N.E.2d 622 (Ulster Electric Supply Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
207 A.D.2d 150 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Menorah Nursing Home, Inc. v. Zukov
153 A.D.2d 13 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Great Lakes Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Camful Industries, Inc.
148 A.D.2d 927 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Vigliarolo Bros. v. Lanza Contracting Corp.
127 Misc. 2d 965 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1985)