Ulster Electric Supply Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
This text of 283 N.E.2d 622 (Ulster Electric Supply Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The letter, dated November 16, 1967, sent by the plaintiff to the defendant general contractor — in which it announced that “ [w]e are therefore proceeding with a lien against [the] job ” —may not be regarded as the notice which section 137 of the State Finance Law requires as a condition precedent to an action on the general contractor’s payment bond by a person who furnishes materials to a subcontractor. We pass on no other question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 N.E.2d 622, 30 N.Y.2d 712, 332 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ulster-electric-supply-co-v-maryland-casualty-co-ny-1972.