Uher v. Toys "R" Us
This text of 292 A.D.2d 595 (Uher v. Toys "R" Us) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Eerier, J.), entered October 12, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against them dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs’ contention that the jury verdict should be set aside as inconsistent is unpreserved for appellate review, since they did not raise that issue before the jury was discharged (see Barry v Manglass, 55 NY2d 803, 806; Clements v Lindsey, 237 AD2d 557).
The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Florio, O’Brien and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
292 A.D.2d 595, 739 N.Y.S.2d 599, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uher-v-toys-r-us-nyappdiv-2002.