Tyler v. Palmetto GBA

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2341

CHARLENE E. TYLER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

PALMETTO GBA,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:09-cv-01119-CMC)

Submitted: May 24, 2010 Decided: June 15, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William T. Toal, JOHNSON, TOAL & BATTISTE, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Kathryn Thomas, Fred A. Williams, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charlene E. Tyler appeals the district court’s

judgment in Palmetto GBA’s favor on Tyler’s claim for severance

pay, brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security

Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001 to 1461 (West 2008 & Supp.

2009). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

See Tyler v. Palmetto GBA, No. 3:09-cv-01119-CMC (D.S.C. filed

Nov. 2, 2009, entered Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED