Tyler v. Palmetto GBA

383 F. App'x 258
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 15, 2010·No. No. 09-2341·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charlene E. Tyler appeals the district court’s judgment in Palmetto GBA’s favor on Tyler’s claim for severance pay, brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001 to 1461 (West 2008 & Supp.2009). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Tyler v. Palmetto GBA, No. 3:09-cv-[259]*25901119-CMC, 2009 WL 3698124 (D.S.C. filed Nov. 2, 2009, entered Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tyler v. Palmetto GBA, 383 F. App'x 258 (4th Cir. 2010).

383 F. App'x 258 (Tyler v. Palmetto GBA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related