Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Tweed v. Bowden

Tweed v. Bowden

840 So. 2d 1094, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2399, 2003 WL 554198
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 28, 2003
DocketNo. 1D02-4599
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 840 So. 2d 1094 (Tweed v. Bowden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tweed v. Bowden, 840 So. 2d 1094, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2399, 2003 WL 554198 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order, dated January 13, 2002, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order on appeal, Order of Dismissal, dated October 20, 2002, is neither a final appealable order nor an appealable partial final order where an interrelated claim for mandamus is pending below where such claim was dismissed without prejudice to amend. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97, 99-100 (Fla.1974); Augustin v. Blount, 573 So.2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Fla.RApp. P. 9.110(k), (m).

DISMISSED.

ALLEN, C.J., BENTON and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

D'Asaro v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection
846 So. 2d 636 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
840 So. 2d 1094, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2399, 2003 WL 554198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tweed-v-bowden-fladistctapp-2003.