D'Asaro v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection

846 So. 2d 636, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7972, 2003 WL 21228402
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 29, 2003·No. No. 1D03-1184·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellees’ Motion to Dismiss, filed on March 26, 2003, as well as Appellants’ Response to Motion to Dismiss Appeal and Order(s) to Show Cause, filed on April 24, 2003, we GRANT the appellees’ Motion to Dismiss and hereby dismiss this appeal as premature. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97, 99 (Fla.1974). The order on appeal is not a final appealable order because it merely dismissed appellants’ complaint without prejudice to their right to file an amended complaint, which did not bring an end to the judicial labor of the cause. See Tweed v. Bowden, 840 So.2d 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Augustin v. Blount, Inc., 573 So.2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

The appellees’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and for Determination of Inapplicability of Notice Provision, filed on April 29, 2003 is DENIED.

BARFIELD, WOLF and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D'Asaro v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 846 So. 2d 636, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7972, 2003 WL 21228402 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

846 So. 2d 636 (D'Asaro v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Augustin v. Blount, Inc.
573 So. 2d 104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
SLT Warehouse Company v. Webb
304 So. 2d 97 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Tweed v. Bowden
840 So. 2d 1094 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)