Turnock v. Ragsdale

503 U.S. 916

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 9, 1992·No. No. 88-790·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

C. A. 7th Cir. [Probable jurisdiction postponed, 492 U. S. 916.] Appeal dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turnock v. Ragsdale, 503 U.S. 916 (1992).

Pincite

503 U.S. 916 (Turnock v. Ragsdale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGinty v. State of NY

14 F. Supp. 2d 241 (N.D. New York, 1998)

Richard M. Ragsdale, M.D. v. John R. Lumpkin, M.D., Director of the Illinois Department of Public Health, James E. Ryan, Attorney General of Illinois, and Nikki M. Zollar, Director of the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation, and Jack O'malley, State's Attorney of Cook County, Illinois, as Representative of the Class of All Illinois State's Attorneys

94 F.3d 647 (Seventh Circuit, 1996)

A Woman's Choice-East Side Women's Clinic v. Newman

904 F. Supp. 1434 (S.D. Indiana, 1995)

Vickery v. Jones

878 F. Supp. 1179 (S.D. Illinois, 1995)