Home/Supreme Court/Turnock v. Ragsdale

Turnock v. Ragsdale

503 U.S. 916
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 9, 1992
DocketNo. 88-790
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 503 U.S. 916 (Turnock v. Ragsdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turnock v. Ragsdale, 503 U.S. 916 (1992).

Opinion

C. A. 7th Cir. [Probable jurisdiction postponed, 492 U. S. 916.] Appeal dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGinty v. State of NY
14 F. Supp. 2d 241 (N.D. New York, 1998)
Richard M. Ragsdale, M.D. v. John R. Lumpkin, M.D., Director of the Illinois Department of Public Health, James E. Ryan, Attorney General of Illinois, and Nikki M. Zollar, Director of the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation, and Jack O'malley, State's Attorney of Cook County, Illinois, as Representative of the Class of All Illinois State's Attorneys
94 F.3d 647 (Seventh Circuit, 1996)
A Woman's Choice-East Side Women's Clinic v. Newman
904 F. Supp. 1434 (S.D. Indiana, 1995)
Vickery v. Jones
878 F. Supp. 1179 (S.D. Illinois, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
503 U.S. 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turnock-v-ragsdale-scotus-1992.