Home/Supreme Court/Turnock v. Ragsdale

Turnock v. Ragsdale

493 U.S. 802, 110 S. Ct. 38
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turnock v. Ragsdale. Read the opinion of the Court — 493 U.S. 987 →
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 2, 1989·No. No. 88-790·Published

Opinion

C. A. 7th Cir. [Probable jurisdiction postponed, 492 U. S. 916.] Motion of Alan Ernest for leave to represent children unborn and born alive denied. Motion of Legal Defense for Unborn Children for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae denied. Motion of Larry Joyce for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for additional time for oral argument denied.

Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turnock v. Ragsdale, 493 U.S. 802, 110 S. Ct. 38 (1989).

493 U.S. 802 (Turnock v. Ragsdale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.