Turner v. Wells, Fargo & Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Turner v. Wells, Fargo & Co.

37 P. 94, 10 Utah 75, 1894 Utah LEXIS 10

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedJune 4, 1894

DocketNo. 418

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 37 P. 94 (Turner v. Wells, Fargo & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. Wells, Fargo & Co., 37 P. 94, 10 Utah 75, 1894 Utah LEXIS 10 (Utah 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

MeeRIti, C. J.:

In the court below, this case and the two cases of Martha Turner, plaintiff and respondent, v. Union National Bank, defendant, and Frank Kimball, intervenor and appellant, and also the case of Martha Turner, plaintiff and respondent, v. The Utah Title Insurance & Trust Company, defendant, and Frank Kimball, intervenor and appellant, were tried together. The same evidence was heard and considered. The findings of fact and conclusions of law and the exceptions were substantially the same, and the same objections and exceptions to the admission of evidence, and the same assignment of errors, were made in each case. The pleadings were alike, and the basis of each action, and the facts and legal principles involved, were the same. All of these cases were submitted upon the argument and submission of the case against the Utah Title Insurance Company (decided at the present term) ante, p. 61 (37 Pac. 91). Upon the authority of the decision in that case, the judgment and decree of the court below in this case is reversed, and the case remanded, with directions to the court below to enter a judgment and decree in favor of the intervenor, canceling the assignment, and delivering the same to the intervenor, and directing the clerk of the court below to pay over the money in his hands in this case as custodian of the court to the intervenor.

MINER, Smith, and Bartoh, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MeeRIti, C. J.:

In the court below, this case and the two cases of Martha Turner, plaintiff and respondent, v. Union National Bank, defendant, and Frank Kimball, intervenor and appellant, and also the case of Martha Turner, plaintiff and respondent, v. The Utah Title Insurance & Trust Company, defendant, and Frank Kimball, intervenor and appellant, were tried together. The same evidence was heard and considered. The findings of fact and conclusions of law and the exceptions were substantially the same, and the same objections and exceptions to the admission of evidence, and the same assignment of errors, were made in each case. The pleadings were alike, and the basis of each action, and the facts and legal principles involved, were the same. All of these cases were submitted upon the argument and submission of the case against the Utah Title Insurance Company (decided at the present term) ante, p. 61 (37 Pac. 91). Upon the authority of the decision in that case, the judgment and decree of the court below in this case is reversed, and the case remanded, with directions to the court below to enter a judgment and decree in favor of the intervenor, canceling the assignment, and delivering the same to the intervenor, and directing the clerk of the court below to pay over the money in his hands in this case as custodian of the court to the intervenor.

MINER, Smith, and Bartoh, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 P. 94, 10 Utah 75, 1894 Utah LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-wells-fargo-co-utah-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack