Turner v. Virginia

449 F. App'x 287
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. Virginia. Read the opinion of the Court — 415 F. App'x 477
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 7, 2011·No. No. 11-1591·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Turner v. Virginia, No. 7:10-cv-00555-SGW-mfu (W.D.Va. May 27, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [288]*288in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. Virginia, 449 F. App'x 287 (4th Cir. 2011).

449 F. App'x 287 (Turner v. Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.