Turner v. Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Turner v. Virginia

310 F. App'x 621

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. Virginia. Read the opinion of the Court — 415 F. App'x 477 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 11, 2009·No. No. 08-2385·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s order granting his request to proceed in forma pauperis but dismissing this case as patently frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s order granting his request to proceed in forma pauperis but dismissing this case as patently frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Turner v. Virginia, 310 F. App'x 621 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

310 F. App'x 621 (Turner v. Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related