Turner v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 386
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Cust. Ct. 278 →
United States Customs Court·Decided July 31, 1957·No. No. 61095; protest 295266-K/8433 (Chicago)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, “consists of metal combs not designed to be worn on apparel or carried on or about or attached to the person, and not colored with gold, lacquer, or wholly or in chief value of gold, and not plated, and not wholly or in chief value of platinum, and not wholly or in chief value of silver,” the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. As to all other merchandise, the protest was dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Turner v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 386 (cusc 1957).
39 Cust. Ct. 386 (Turner v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.