Turner v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 672
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Cust. Ct. 278
United States Customs Court·Decided June 5, 1957·No. Reap. Dec. 8819; Entry Nos. 902584; 741383; 792074·Published

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached to and made part of the decision herein, present the question of the proper dutiable value of certain merchandise imported from England.

The parties hereto have stipulated and agreed that, at the time of exportation of the involved merchandise, there was no foreign, export, or United States value for such or similar merchandise; that cost of production is the proper basis of appraisement; and that said cost of production is as follows:

Item
Superb Electric Immersion Heaters_£0-4-3
Es-Es Electric Immersion Thermostat Major_£0-8-0
Upon the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)), is the proper basis of value for the articles in issue and that said value is as follows:
Item
Superb Electric Immersion Heaters_£0-4-3
Es-Es Electric Immersion Thermostat Major_£0-8-0

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 672 (cusc 1957).

38 Cust. Ct. 672 (Turner v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related