Turner v. State of Georgia

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia
DecidedJanuary 8, 2025
Docket1:24-cv-00201
StatusUnknown

This text of Turner v. State of Georgia (Turner v. State of Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. State of Georgia, (S.D. Ga. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION JOHN TREVOR TURNER, ) Petitioner, v. CV 124-201 STATE OF GEORGIA; RICHMOND COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPT; and DEVIN _) CAMANCHO, ) Respondents.

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion and DISMISSES the instant petition, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, without prejudice. Further, a prisoner seeking relief under § 2254 must obtain a certificate of appealability (“COA”) before appealing the denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus. This Court “must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant.” Rule 11(a) to the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings. This Court should grant a COA only if the prisoner makes a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, and in consideration of the standards enunciated in Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 482-84

(2000), Petitioner has failed to make the requisite showing. Accordingly, the Court DENIES

a COA in this case.! Moreover, because there are no non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal, an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and Petitioner is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Upon the foregoing, the oe CLOSES this civil action. SO ORDERED this é day of January, 2025, at Augusta, Georgia.

Mh (| Ley BHA 4 HONORABLE J. RANDAL HALL ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

' “Tf the court denies a certificate, the parties may not appeal the denial but may seek a certificate from the court of appeals under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22.” Rule 11(a) to the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slack v. McDaniel
529 U.S. 473 (Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Turner v. State of Georgia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-state-of-georgia-gasd-2025.