Turner v. State

190 Ga. 316
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 23, 1940
DocketNo. 13126
StatusPublished

This text of 190 Ga. 316 (Turner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. State, 190 Ga. 316 (Ga. 1940).

Opinion

Bell, Justice.

1. It is not error to fail to instruct the jury on the law of justifiable homicide where there is no evidence that the killing was justified. Miller v. State, 139 Ga. 716 (4) (78 S. E. 181); Benjamin v. State, 150 Ga. 78 (2) (102 S. E. 427).

2. In the instant case there was no evidence to show that the alleged homicide was justifiable either under the doctrine of reasonable fears or under the rule as to self-defense; and consequently the judge did not err in failing to charge upon the law of justifiable homicide as related to either theory.

(а) The extrajudicial statements declared by witnesses to have been made by the accused did not exculpate him, as contended.

(б) His statement to one of the witnesses “that he was protecting himself” was- a mere conclusion, and, being contradicted by the statements of fact made by him in the same connection, did not show justification. Sweat v. State, 107 Ga. 712 (33 S. E. 422) ; Ogletree v. State, 115 Ga. 835 (42 S. E. 255).

3. Nor was there anything in the defendant’s statement to the jury to show justifiable homicide, as insisted in the motion for new trial. Moreover, the omission, without request, to charge the jury on a theory which finds support only in the prisoner’s statement at the trial is not erroneous. Felder v. State, 149 Ga. 538 (101 S. E. 179) ; Hill v. State, 169 Ga. 455 (5) (150 S. E. 587) ; McLendon v. State, 172. Ga. 267 (2) (157 S. E. 475).

4. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Gilbert G. Robinson, for plaintiff in error. Milis G. Arnall, attorney-general, M. L. Forrester, solicitor-general, Duke Davis and G. M. Gregory Jr., assistant attorneys-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sweat v. State
33 S.E. 422 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Ogletree v. State
42 S.E. 255 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Miller v. State
78 S.E. 181 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Felder v. State
101 S.E. 179 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)
Benjamin v. State
102 S.E. 427 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)
Hill v. State
150 S.E. 587 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
McLendon v. State
157 S.E. 475 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 Ga. 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-state-ga-1940.