Massey v. State
This text of 191 Ga. 44 (Massey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where there was no evidence requiring or authorizing a charge upon the subject of voluntary manslaughter, it was not error for the court to omit to charge on this subject, even though the statement of the accused authorized such a charge, there being no request in writing so to charge. The omission, without request, to charge the jury on a theory which finds support only in the prisoner’s statement at the trial is not erroneous. Felder v. State, 149 Ga. 538 (101 S. E. 179) ; Hill v. State, 169 Ga. 455 (5) (150 S. E. 587) ; Turner v. State, 190 Ga. 316 (9 S. E. 2d, 270).
2. The evidence fully authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 Ga. 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massey-v-state-ga-1940.