Turner v. State
866 So. 2d 1250, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1325, 2004 WL 384479
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 873 So. 2d 480 →
Opinion
The denial of postconviction relief is affirmed because the motion is facially insufficient. The motion failed to allege with sufficient specificity the substance of the witnesses’ testimony or explain how the omission of the evidence prejudiced the trial. See Catis v. State, 741 So.2d 1140, 1142 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(c)(6). Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant filing, within 30 days of the issuance of the mandate, a motion that complies with the requirements of Catis.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Turner v. State, 866 So. 2d 1250, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1325, 2004 WL 384479 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
866 So. 2d 1250 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Catis v. State
741 So. 2d 1140 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)