Turner v. State
593 So. 2d 309, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 515, 1992 WL 12308
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 29, 1992·No. No. 91-1239·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm in all respects, except we reverse the sentence since the state concedes that the trial court imposed an improper sentence on Stanley M. Turner (Turner). Upon remand, the trial court shall resen-tence Turner within the guidelines and hold a hearing on the amount of restitution and costs. A hearing is necessary because the trial court’s order does not conform with its oral statement. See Philips v. State, 578 So.2d 40, 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Turner v. State, 593 So. 2d 309, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 515, 1992 WL 12308 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
593 So. 2d 309 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Horne v. State
593 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)