Turner v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Turner v. State

106 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 699

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 12, 1926

Docket3 Div. 500.

StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 925 (Turner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. State, 106 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 699 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

•RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of petit larceny. The property, a fly tent or tarpaulin, was taken from a building where it had been left by the prosecuting witness. A discussion of the evidence would not be helpful. That offered on behalf of the state and the defendant made the question of defendant’s guilt vel non one proper to be submitted to the jury. Morrow v. State, 19 Ala. App. 212, 97 So. 106. There was no motion for a new trial. We find nowhere any prejudicial error, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

•RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of petit larceny. The property, a fly tent or tarpaulin, was taken from a building where it had been left by the prosecuting witness. A discussion of the evidence would not be helpful. That offered on behalf of the state and the defendant made the question of defendant’s guilt vel non one proper to be submitted to the jury. Morrow v. State, 19 Ala. App. 212, 97 So. 106. There was no motion for a new trial. We find nowhere any prejudicial error, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-state-alactapp-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack