Turner v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Turner v. State

106 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 699

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Ala. App. 95 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 12, 1926·No. 3 Div. 500.·Published

Opinion

•RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of petit larceny. The property, a fly tent or tarpaulin, was taken from a building where it had been left by the prosecuting witness. A discussion of the evidence would not be helpful. That offered on behalf of the state and the defendant made the question of defendant’s guilt vel non one proper to be submitted to the jury. Morrow v. State, 19 Ala. App. 212, 97 So. 106. There was no motion for a new trial. We find nowhere any prejudicial error, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

•RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of petit larceny. The property, a fly tent or tarpaulin, was taken from a building where it had been left by the prosecuting witness. A discussion of the evidence would not be helpful. That offered on behalf of the state and the defendant made the question of defendant’s guilt vel non one proper to be submitted to the jury. Morrow v. State, 19 Ala. App. 212, 97 So. 106. There was no motion for a new trial. We find nowhere any prejudicial error, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Turner v. State, 106 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 699 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

106 So. 925 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related