Turner v. State

103 So. 927, 20 Ala. App. 699
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Ala. App. 95
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 17, 1925·No. 3 Div. 481.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

A complete distilling outfit was found near defendant’s residence, and there was evidence from which the jury could conclude that such still was suitable to be used for the purpose of manufacturing whisky. There was also evidence tending to connect this defendant with its possession. The general charge, as requested by the defendant, was properly refused, and the motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial was properly overruled. We find no error in the record. Let the judgment be affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. State, 103 So. 927, 20 Ala. App. 699 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

103 So. 927 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.