Turner v. Rogers
121 Mass. 12, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 264
Opinion
The agreement of the plaintiff and the transfer to the defendant of the other note were a sufficient consideration for the note in suit. Hubon v. Park, 116 Mass. 541. The contracts of the plaintiff and of the defendant being distinct, and to be performed at different times, the non-perform-once of the one is no defence to an action on the other. Upon the question of set-off, no ruling appears to have been made at the trial, Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Turner v. Rogers, 121 Mass. 12, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 264 (Mass. 1876).
121 Mass. 12 (Turner v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beam v. . Wright
32 S.E.2d 213 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
Nicholson v. American Hide & Leather Co.
30 N.E.2d 376 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1940)
Pelonsky v. Wattendorf
152 N.E. 337 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1926)
Finance Corp. of New England, Inc. v. Maynard
143 N.E. 908 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Hanson & Parker, Ltd. v. Wittenberg
91 N.E. 383 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
Tronson v. Colby University
84 N.W. 474 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1900)
Snow v. Alley
11 N.E. 764 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1887)
Hapgood v. Wellington
136 Mass. 217 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1884)