Home/Oregon Supreme Court/Turner v. Hendryx

Turner v. Hendryx

167 P. 1019, 86 Or. 590
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 16, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 167 P. 1019 (Turner v. Hendryx) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. Hendryx, 167 P. 1019, 86 Or. 590 (Or. 1917).

Opinions

Mr. Justice Benson

delivered the opinion of the court.

1. Respondents move to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the Multnomah County Court has disposed of the matter by a decree awarding the child in question to them under a petition for the adoption of the hoy. An investigation discloses that this proceeding was begun in the Circuit Court on March 13,1917, and that before answering herein defendants filed a petition in the County Court asking for the adoption of the child upon the ground that the father had abandoned it. The decrees were both made and entered on March 23d. Since the appeal was perfected in this case a writ of review has been issued and is now pending in the Circuit Court in the adoption proceedings. This state of facts is not grounds for the dismissal of an appeal: 4 C. J. 586. The motion is therefore denied. - Denied.

Mr. Chief Justice McBride, Mr. Justice Burnett and Mr. Justice Harris concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cornelison v. Seabold
460 P.2d 1009 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1969)
Gheen v. Gheen
426 P.2d 876 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1967)
Parmele v. Mathews
379 P.2d 868 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1963)
In Re Newman
187 Cal. App. 2d 377 (California Court of Appeal, 1960)
Schultz v. First Nat. Bk. of Portland
348 P.2d 22 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1959)
Fox v. Lasley
318 P.2d 933 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1957)
In Re Croze
302 P.2d 595 (California Court of Appeal, 1956)
MacOmber v. Alexander
255 P.2d 164 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1953)
DENESSEN ET UX. v. Taylor
255 P.2d 148 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1953)
Quinn v. Hanks
233 P.2d 767 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1951)
Bartlett v. Bartlett
152 P.2d 402 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1944)
Armstrong v. Vancil
128 P.2d 951 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1942)
Yahola v. Berryhill
1937 OK 306 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1937)
Henkle v. Patterson
56 P.2d 343 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1936)
Barry v. White
64 F.2d 707 (D.C. Circuit, 1933)
State Ex Rel. Luedinghaus Lumber Co. v. Stapleton
10 P.2d 600 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1932)
Astoria Savings Bank v. Normand
267 P. 524 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1928)
State v. Stilwell
221 P. 174 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1923)
State v. Laundy
204 P. 958 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1922)
In Matter of Badger
226 S.W. 936 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 P. 1019, 86 Or. 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-hendryx-or-1917.