Turner v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Turner v. Eastman Kodak Co.

210 A.D.2d 883, 620 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13330

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 210 A.D.2d 883 (Turner v. Eastman Kodak Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. Eastman Kodak Co., 210 A.D.2d 883, 620 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Dennis Turner (plaintiff), an ironworker, fell 26 to 30 feet from the top of a ladder on a construction site owned by defendant. Supreme Court erred in denying plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment with respect to liability on the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. Plaintiffs established both a violation of the statute and that the violation was the proximate cause of his injury (see, Bland v Manocherian, 66 NY2d 452). A co-worker, who heard but did not see plaintiff fall, corroborated plaintiff’s account of the incident and defendant offered no contradictory proof (see, Madigan v United Parcel Serv., 193 AD2d 1102; cf., Carlos v Rochester Gen. Hosp., 163 AD2d 894). Furthermore, although there was no proof that the ladder was defective, proper protection was not provided to prevent plaintiff from falling while working at an elevation. Because it is the duty of the owner, not the worker, to ensure the proper placement and use of safety devices (Heath v Soloff Constr., 107 AD2d 507, 510-512), any failure by plaintiff to use his own safety devices does not absolve defendant of liability (see, Allman v Ciminelli Constr. Co., 184 AD2d 1022; Walsh v Baker, 172 AD2d 1038). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Ark, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Dennis Turner (plaintiff), an ironworker, fell 26 to 30 feet from the top of a ladder on a construction site owned by defendant. Supreme Court erred in denying plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment with respect to liability on the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. Plaintiffs established both a violation of the statute and that the violation was the proximate cause of his injury (see, Bland v Manocherian, 66 NY2d 452). A co-worker, who heard but did not see plaintiff fall, corroborated plaintiff’s account of the incident and defendant offered no contradictory proof (see, Madigan v United Parcel Serv., 193 AD2d 1102; cf., Carlos v Rochester Gen. Hosp., 163 AD2d 894). Furthermore, although there was no proof that the ladder was defective, proper protection was not provided to prevent plaintiff from falling while working at an elevation. Because it is the duty of the owner, not the worker, to ensure the proper placement and use of safety devices (Heath v Soloff Constr., 107 AD2d 507, 510-512), any failure by plaintiff to use his own safety devices does not absolve defendant of liability (see, Allman v Ciminelli Constr. Co., 184 AD2d 1022; Walsh v Baker, 172 AD2d 1038). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Ark, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D.2d 883, 620 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-eastman-kodak-co-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack