Flick v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Flick v. Eastman Kodak Co.

219 A.D.2d 883, 632 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11127

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 219 A.D.2d 883 (Flick v. Eastman Kodak Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flick v. Eastman Kodak Co., 219 A.D.2d 883, 632 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal denied. Memorandum: An appeal must be taken within 30 days of service of the order to be appealed with notice of entry thereon (CPLR 5513 [a]). Frontier Insulation/Rochester, Inc., has never been served with a copy of the order dated May 31, 1994, with notice of entry, and, therefore, its time to appeal has not yet begun to run. Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Balio, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss appeal denied. Memorandum: An appeal must be taken within 30 days of service of the order to be appealed with notice of entry thereon (CPLR 5513 [a]). Frontier Insulation/Rochester, Inc., has never been served with a copy of the order dated May 31, 1994, with notice of entry, and, therefore, its time to appeal has not yet begun to run. Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Balio, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 A.D.2d 883, 632 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flick-v-eastman-kodak-co-nyappdiv-1995.