Turner v. Angelone

57 F. App'x 180
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 12, 2003·No. 02-7601·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mark D. Turner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude that Turner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Turner v. Angelone, No. CA-01-842 7 (W.D.Va. Sept. 27, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-pealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. Angelone, 57 F. App'x 180 (4th Cir. 2003).

57 F. App'x 180 (Turner v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related