Turnage v. United States Department of Agriculture
This text of 231 Ct. Cl. 859 (Turnage v. United States Department of Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board ( mspb ), upholding the employing agency’s denial to petitioner of a within-grade increase in pay. Turnage v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, M.S.P.B., No. DC531D8010018, decided February 1, 1982.
This matter is directly controlled by Holder v. Department of the Army, 229 Ct.Cl. 417, 670 F.2d 1007 (1982) and Duke v. Department of the Air Force, 230 Ct.Cl. 977 (1982), both of which decisions rule squarely that we have no jurisdiction, as the United States Court of Claims, over denials of discretionary within-grade pay raises. Those decisions are binding and inclusive here.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
This Court has previously upheld the MSPB’s earlier decision affirming the employing agency’s separate determination to remove petitioner. Turnage v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Appeal No. 27-80, 230 Ct.Cl. 799 (1982).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 Ct. Cl. 859, 1982 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 532, 1982 WL 25783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turnage-v-united-states-department-of-agriculture-cc-1982.