Turnage v. United States Department of Agriculture

231 Ct. Cl. 859, 1982 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 532, 1982 WL 25783
United States Court of Claims·Decided July 23, 1982·No. App. No. 10-82·Published

Opinion

per curiam:

This is an appeal from a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board ( mspb ), upholding the employing agency’s denial to petitioner of a within-grade increase in pay. Turnage v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, M.S.P.B., No. DC531D8010018, decided February 1, 1982.* Defendant moves to dismiss on the ground that we have no jurisdiction over an administrative denial of a discretionary within-grade pay increase. Petitioner has failed to respond and his time to do so has expired.

This matter is directly controlled by Holder v. Department of the Army, 229 Ct.Cl. 417, 670 F.2d 1007 (1982) and Duke v. Department of the Air Force, 230 Ct.Cl. 977 (1982), both of which decisions rule squarely that we have no jurisdiction, as the United States Court of Claims, over denials of discretionary within-grade pay raises. Those decisions are binding and inclusive here.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turnage v. United States Department of Agriculture, 231 Ct. Cl. 859, 1982 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 532, 1982 WL 25783 (cc 1982).

231 Ct. Cl. 859 (Turnage v. United States Department of Agriculture) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holder v. Department of the Army
670 F.2d 1007 (Court of Claims, 1982)
Turnage v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
230 Ct. Cl. 799 (Court of Claims, 1982)
Duke v. Department of the Air Force
230 Ct. Cl. 977 (Court of Claims, 1982)