Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Turek v. Attorney Grievance Commission

Turek v. Attorney Grievance Commission

621 N.W.2d 450, 2001 Mich. LEXIS 184, 2001 WL 99030
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 6, 2001
Docket116851
StatusPublished

This text of 621 N.W.2d 450 (Turek v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turek v. Attorney Grievance Commission, 621 N.W.2d 450, 2001 Mich. LEXIS 184, 2001 WL 99030 (Mich. 2001).

Opinion

621 N.W.2d 450 (2001)

George C. TUREK, Complainant,
v.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 116851.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

February 6, 2001.

On order of the Court, the complaint for mandamus is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

WEAVER, J., dissents and states as follows:

I would remand the case to the Attorney Grievance Commission for reconsideration of its decision in this case in light of Grievance Administrator v. Lopation, 462 Mich. 235, 612 N.W.2d 120 (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guardian Industries Corp. v. Department of Treasury
621 N.W.2d 450 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2001)
Grievance Administrator v. Lopatin
612 N.W.2d 120 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
621 N.W.2d 450, 2001 Mich. LEXIS 184, 2001 WL 99030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turek-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2001.