Turek v. Attorney Grievance Commission
621 N.W.2d 450, 2001 Mich. LEXIS 184, 2001 WL 99030
Opinion
George C. TUREK, Complainant,
v.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the complaint for mandamus is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
WEAVER, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would remand the case to the Attorney Grievance Commission for reconsideration of its decision in this case in light of Grievance Administrator v. Lopation, 462 Mich. 235, 612 N.W.2d 120 (2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Turek v. Attorney Grievance Commission, 621 N.W.2d 450, 2001 Mich. LEXIS 184, 2001 WL 99030 (Mich. 2001).
621 N.W.2d 450 (Turek v. Attorney Grievance Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Guardian Industries Corp. v. Department of Treasury
621 N.W.2d 450 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2001)
Grievance Administrator v. Lopatin
612 N.W.2d 120 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)