Tumlin v. O'Bryan & Bros.
This text of 68 Ga. 65 (Tumlin v. O'Bryan & Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[66]*66The defendant shows that he was in court with a defense; if, therefore, the court rendered an illegal judgment against him, over his defense, his remedy was by writ of error.
If the judgment was rendered against him by fraud, accident or mistake, or the acts of the adverse party, unmixed with negligence on his part, his remedy was by motion to vacate the judgment, or bill in equity for relief. That an affidavit of illegality is not the proper remedy in such a case is too manifest for doubt. Code, §§3671, 3595; 63 Ga., 510; 64 Ga., 565.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 Ga. 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tumlin-v-obryan-bros-ga-1881.