Moultrie Packing Co. v. Atlanta Mutual Ass'n

97 S.E. 552, 23 Ga. App. 44, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 27
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 11, 1918·No. 9541·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

A garnishee who had not answered could not hy affidavit of illegality arrest an execution and set aside a judgment, upon the ground that before its rendition against the garnishee as being in default, the defendant had paid to the attorney for the plaintiff in ft. fa. a part of the claim and had given him a check and' note to cover the balance. • Affidavit of illegality is not the proper remedy in such a ease. Tumlin v. O’Bryan, 68 Ga. 65; Lynch v. Gannon, 57 Ga. 608; Civil Code (1910), § 5311. The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the affidavit of illegality.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moultrie Packing Co. v. Atlanta Mutual Ass'n, 97 S.E. 552, 23 Ga. App. 44, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 27 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

97 S.E. 552 (Moultrie Packing Co. v. Atlanta Mutual Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tumlin v. O'Bryan & Bros.
68 Ga. 65 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1881)
Lynch v. Gannon
57 Ga. 608 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1876)