Moultrie Packing Co. v. Atlanta Mutual Ass'n

97 S.E. 552, 23 Ga. App. 44, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 27
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 11, 1918
Docket9541
StatusPublished

This text of 97 S.E. 552 (Moultrie Packing Co. v. Atlanta Mutual Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moultrie Packing Co. v. Atlanta Mutual Ass'n, 97 S.E. 552, 23 Ga. App. 44, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 27 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Luke, J.

A garnishee who had not answered could not hy affidavit of illegality arrest an execution and set aside a judgment, upon the ground that before its rendition against the garnishee as being in default, the defendant had paid to the attorney for the plaintiff in ft. fa. a part of the claim and had given him a check and' note to cover the balance. • Affidavit of illegality is not the proper remedy in such a ease. Tumlin v. O’Bryan, 68 Ga. 65; Lynch v. Gannon, 57 Ga. 608; Civil Code (1910), § 5311. The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the affidavit of illegality.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tumlin v. O'Bryan & Bros.
68 Ga. 65 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1881)
Lynch v. Gannon
57 Ga. 608 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 S.E. 552, 23 Ga. App. 44, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moultrie-packing-co-v-atlanta-mutual-assn-gactapp-1918.