Tumaneng v. Tumaneng

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tumaneng v. Tumaneng. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 Haw. 468
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided March 3, 2016·No. SCWC-14-0000895·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000895 03-MAR-2016 09:52 AM SCWC-14-0000895

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________

BRELIE GAIL BALON TUMANENG, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

BRIXON ANDRES TUMANENG, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0000895; FC-D NO. 12-1-7982)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Brelie Gail Balon Tumaneng’s application for writ of certiorari filed on January 22, 2016, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, March 3, 2016.

Charles H. Brower /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Richard J. Diehl for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tumaneng v. Tumaneng, (haw 2016).

Tumaneng v. Tumaneng (Tumaneng v. Tumaneng) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.