Tumaneng v. Tumaneng
This text of Tumaneng v. Tumaneng (Tumaneng v. Tumaneng) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000895 03-MAR-2016 09:52 AM SCWC-14-0000895
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________
BRELIE GAIL BALON TUMANENG, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
BRIXON ANDRES TUMANENG, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0000895; FC-D NO. 12-1-7982)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Brelie Gail Balon Tumaneng’s application for writ of certiorari filed on January 22, 2016, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, March 3, 2016.
Charles H. Brower /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Richard J. Diehl for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tumaneng v. Tumaneng, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tumaneng-v-tumaneng-haw-2016.