Tully v. Spicer
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6682
THOMAS M. TULLY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NICOLE M. SPICER, Frederick County Virginia Commonwealth Attorney; MELISSA RICE, Director of Victim Witness Program; FRED D. HILDEBRAND, Supervisor of Northwestern Regional Adult Detention Center; GENE BOYCE, Telephone overseer at Northwestern Regional Adult Detention Center; LISA HOSKINS, Convicted liar in Virginia Court System,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:07-cv-00188-SGW)
Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 30, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas M. Tully, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Thomas M. Tully appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tully
v. Spicer, No. 7:07-cv-00188-SGW (W.D. Va. Apr. 19, 2007). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tully v. Spicer (Tully v. Spicer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.