Tully v. Spicer

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 30, 2007·No. 07-6682·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6682

THOMAS M. TULLY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NICOLE M. SPICER, Frederick County Virginia Commonwealth Attorney; MELISSA RICE, Director of Victim Witness Program; FRED D. HILDEBRAND, Supervisor of Northwestern Regional Adult Detention Center; GENE BOYCE, Telephone overseer at Northwestern Regional Adult Detention Center; LISA HOSKINS, Convicted liar in Virginia Court System,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:07-cv-00188-SGW)

Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 30, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas M. Tully, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thomas M. Tully appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tully

v. Spicer, No. 7:07-cv-00188-SGW (W.D. Va. Apr. 19, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tully v. Spicer, (4th Cir. 2007).

Tully v. Spicer (Tully v. Spicer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related