Tully v. Spicer

Fourth Circuit

Tully v. Spicer

238 F. App'x 981

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 30, 2007·No. No. 07-6682·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Thomas M. Tully appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tully v. Spicer, No. 7:07-cv-00188-SGW, 2007 WL 1189607 (W.D.Va. Apr. 19, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [982]*982and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Thomas M. Tully appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tully v. Spicer, No. 7:07-cv-00188-SGW, 2007 WL 1189607 (W.D.Va. Apr. 19, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [982]*982and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Tully v. Spicer, 238 F. App'x 981 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

238 F. App'x 981 (Tully v. Spicer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related