Tug Buster Bouchard Corp. v. Wetzler

675 N.E.2d 1223, 89 N.Y.2d 830, 653 N.Y.S.2d 271, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3166
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 14, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs to petitioners payable by respondent.

Inasmuch as the respondent State explicitly conceded the unconstitutionality of the Petroleum Business Tax regime as applied to petitioners, we affirm the decision of the Appellate Division (217 AD2d 192) and conclude that we need decide nothing more with respect to this case.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tug Buster Bouchard Corp. v. Wetzler, 675 N.E.2d 1223, 89 N.Y.2d 830, 653 N.Y.S.2d 271, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3166 (N.Y. 1996).

675 N.E.2d 1223 (Tug Buster Bouchard Corp. v. Wetzler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MATTER OF TUG BUSTER BOUCHARD CORP. v. Wetzler
675 N.E.2d 1223 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)