Tug Buster Bouchard Corp. v. Wetzler

New York Court of Appeals

Tug Buster Bouchard Corp. v. Wetzler

675 N.E.2d 1223, 89 N.Y.2d 830, 653 N.Y.S.2d 271, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3166

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 14, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 675 N.E.2d 1223 (Tug Buster Bouchard Corp. v. Wetzler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tug Buster Bouchard Corp. v. Wetzler, 675 N.E.2d 1223, 89 N.Y.2d 830, 653 N.Y.S.2d 271, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3166 (N.Y. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs to petitioners payable by respondent.

Inasmuch as the respondent State explicitly conceded the unconstitutionality of the Petroleum Business Tax regime as applied to petitioners, we affirm the decision of the Appellate Division (217 AD2d 192) and conclude that we need decide nothing more with respect to this case.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI