MATTER OF TUG BUSTER BOUCHARD CORP. v. Wetzler

675 N.E.2d 1223, 89 N.Y.2d 830, 653 N.Y.S.2d 271
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 14, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 675 N.E.2d 1223 (MATTER OF TUG BUSTER BOUCHARD CORP. v. Wetzler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF TUG BUSTER BOUCHARD CORP. v. Wetzler, 675 N.E.2d 1223, 89 N.Y.2d 830, 653 N.Y.S.2d 271 (N.Y. 1996).

Opinion

89 N.Y.2d 830 (1996)
675 N.E.2d 1223
653 N.Y.S.2d 271

In the Matter of Tug Buster Bouchard Corporation et al., Respondents-Appellants,
v.
James W. Wetzler, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, Appellant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 8, 1996.
Decided November 14, 1996.

Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General, Albany (Andrew D. Bing and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Schulz & Associates, L.L.C., Melville (Thomas P. Schulz of counsel), for respondents-appellants.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE and CIPARICK concur.

*833MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs to petitioners payable by respondent.

Inasmuch as the respondent State explicitly conceded the unconstitutionality of the Petroleum Business Tax regime as applied to petitioners, we affirm the decision of the Appellate Division (217 AD2d 192) and conclude that we need decide nothing more with respect to this case.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moran Towing Corp. v. Urbach
1 A.D.2d 722 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Moran Towing Corp. v. Urbach
787 N.E.2d 624 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)
Moran Towing Corp. v. Urbach
182 Misc. 2d 756 (New York Supreme Court, 1999)
Bray Terminals, Inc. v. New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal
248 A.D.2d 832 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Tax Appeals Tribunal
231 A.D.2d 140 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 N.E.2d 1223, 89 N.Y.2d 830, 653 N.Y.S.2d 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-tug-buster-bouchard-corp-v-wetzler-ny-1996.