Tucker v. State

206 So. 3d 87, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14816
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 5, 2016·No. No. 2D16-1496·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla.2011); Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); Ellis v. State, 762 So.2d 912 (Fla.2000); Ward v. State, 946 So.2d 33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Ives v. State, 993 So.2d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Rangel v. State, 937 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

NORTHCUTT, LaROSE, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tucker v. State, 206 So. 3d 87, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14816 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

206 So. 3d 87 (Tucker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BARRY TUCKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019