Tucker v. Ayres

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tucker v. Ayres

336 So. 2d 1224, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15427

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 31, 1976

DocketNo. Z-421

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 336 So. 2d 1224 (Tucker v. Ayres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tucker v. Ayres, 336 So. 2d 1224, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15427 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant Tucker filed this suit for a partnership accounting, then unilaterally dismissed it by serving a notice of dismissal without prejudice. Rule 1.420(a)(1), R.C.P. In taxing the defendant partners’ costs pursuant to motion filed by appellees after the dismissal, the trial court awarded $1,250 in attorneys fees. Rule 1.420(d). On Tucker’s appeal, that award is defended as an appropriate allowance incident to the disposition of a suit for partnership accounting. The principle allowing such awards is akin to that applicable when a claimant and his attorney have brought a fund into court for distribution. A. J. Richey Corp. v. Garvey, 132 Fla. 602, 182 So. 216 (1938); Cooper v. Fulton, 158 So.2d 759 (Fla.App.3d, 1963), cert. discharged, 165 So.2d 161 (Fla.1964). Here, however, the litigation was aborted and no fund was created. Even if an award of attorneys fees were appropriate for a prevailing party defendant in an action such as this, the appellees did not prevail by the voluntary dismissal of Tucker’s suit without prejudice.

The judgment awarding attorneys’ fees is REVERSED, appellees’ motion for an allowance of fees on appeal is DENIED, and the case is REMANDED for entry of a judgment awarding appellees’ costs at trial and appellant’s costs on appeal.

BOYER, C. J., and McCORD, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant Tucker filed this suit for a partnership accounting, then unilaterally dismissed it by serving a notice of dismissal without prejudice. Rule 1.420(a)(1), R.C.P. In taxing the defendant partners’ costs pursuant to motion filed by appellees after the dismissal, the trial court awarded $1,250 in attorneys fees. Rule 1.420(d). On Tucker’s appeal, that award is defended as an appropriate allowance incident to the disposition of a suit for partnership accounting. The principle allowing such awards is akin to that applicable when a claimant and his attorney have brought a fund into court for distribution. A. J. Richey Corp. v. Garvey, 132 Fla. 602, 182 So. 216 (1938); Cooper v. Fulton, 158 So.2d 759 (Fla.App.3d, 1963), cert. discharged, 165 So.2d 161 (Fla.1964). Here, however, the litigation was aborted and no fund was created. Even if an award of attorneys fees were appropriate for a prevailing party defendant in an action such as this, the appellees did not prevail by the voluntary dismissal of Tucker’s suit without prejudice.

The judgment awarding attorneys’ fees is REVERSED, appellees’ motion for an allowance of fees on appeal is DENIED, and the case is REMANDED for entry of a judgment awarding appellees’ costs at trial and appellant’s costs on appeal.

BOYER, C. J., and McCORD, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

336 So. 2d 1224, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-ayres-fladistctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack