Tobin v. Lefkowitz

367 So. 2d 682
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 6, 1979
Docket78-353, 78-354
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 367 So. 2d 682 (Tobin v. Lefkowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tobin v. Lefkowitz, 367 So. 2d 682 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

367 So.2d 682 (1979)

Alvin E. TOBIN, M.A., P.A., Etc., et al., Appellants,
v.
Lawrence LEFKOWITZ, M.D., Appellee.

Nos. 78-353, 78-354.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 6, 1979.
Rehearing Denied March 9, 1979.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Edward A. Perse, Brumer, Moss, Cohen & Rodgers, Miami, for appellants.

Schwartz, Klein & Steinhardt and Norman S. Klein, North Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, KEHOE and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Judge.

No abuse of discretion has been demonstrated in the trial court's determination *683 of the amount of expert witness fees for the plaintiff's accountants who testified at the trial. Keith Investments, Inc. v. James, 220 So.2d 695 (Fla.4th DCA 1969); State Road Department v. Outlaw, 148 So.2d 741 (Fla.1st DCA 1963). That portion of the cost judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

The trial court erred, however, in taxing a sum for the plaintiff's attorney's fee as costs against the appellants-defendants, since there is no statutory or contractual basis for such an award. E.g., Adler v. Adler, 365 So.2d 411 (Fla.3d DCA, 1978). An exception to the rule which ordinarily precludes the recovery of attorney's fees exists when as in Cooper v. Fulton, 158 So.2d 759 (Fla.3d DCA 1963) cert. disch. 165 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1964), one partner secures an accounting from another. However, that exception does not apply in this case because, while one count of the complaint sought a formal accounting, that count was in effect abandoned, and the case was tried to a jury as an ordinary damage suit. See Tucker v. Ayres, 336 So.2d 1224 (Fla.1st DCA 1976); Coffman v. Jordan, 305 So.2d 227 (Fla.4th DCA 1974).

The $5,000.00 award of attorney's fees is therefore stricken from the judgment under review which is otherwise affirmed.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Larmoyeux v. Montgomery
963 So. 2d 813 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Lipsig v. Ramlawi
760 So. 2d 170 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Balzam v. Cohen
427 So. 2d 329 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Hiestand v. Geier
396 So. 2d 744 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Betancourt v. Zipes
391 So. 2d 291 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Adams v. Adams
376 So. 2d 1204 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
367 So. 2d 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tobin-v-lefkowitz-fladistctapp-1979.