Tsutomu Dyo v. Smith

249 S.W. 541
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 15, 1923
DocketNo. 1422.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 249 S.W. 541 (Tsutomu Dyo v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tsutomu Dyo v. Smith, 249 S.W. 541 (Tex. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

HARPER, C. J.

Defendant in error brought this action against plaintiff in error Tsutomu Dyo on a promissory note in the principal sum of $1,000. The defendant pleaded payment in part; judgment for $667:18 appealed.

No brief has been filed by plaintiff in error. Rule 38 for the Courts of Civil Appeals (230 S. W. viii):

“A failure on the part of counsel for the appellant or plaintiff in error to file assignments of error and briefs in the trial court and in the Court of Civil Appeals, within the time and in the manner prescribed by law and by the rules, shall be ground for dismissing the appeal or writ of error, either by the court of its own motion or on motion of the appellee or defendant in error, unless good cause is shown for such failure, and that the appellee or defendant in error has not suffered material injury thereby in his defense of the cause in the appellate court. If the motion be overruled, the Court of Civil Appeals shall give such direction to the cause as it may deem proper.” (Effective September 1, 1921.)

The court is therefore of the opinion that the rule should be enforced, and this writ of error dismissed.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armstrong v. Armstrong
121 S.W.2d 1025 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Dean v. Orton
293 S.W. 703 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Levine v. Cullum Boren Co.
253 S.W. 894 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 S.W. 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tsutomu-dyo-v-smith-texapp-1923.