Armstrong v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Texas

Armstrong v. Armstrong

121 S.W.2d 1025

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedNovember 18, 1938

DocketNo. 1854.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 121 S.W.2d 1025 (Armstrong v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armstrong v. Armstrong, 121 S.W.2d 1025 (Tex. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

GRISSOM, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment granting appellee a divorce. The statement of facts and transcript were filed in the Court of Civil Appeals at Tex-arkana November 16, 1937. The case was transferred to this court by order of the' Supreme Court. The cause was submitted in this court September 30, 1938.

Appellant has failed to file assignments of errors and briefs as required by Court of Civil Appeals Rule 38. No effort to show good cause -for such failure has been made. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed by this court on its own motion. Court of Civil Appeals Rule 38; Du Bose v. Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. of Texas, Tex.Civ.App., 67 S.W.2d 1066; Harding v. Stith, Tex.Civ.App., 88 S.W.2d 528; Sisk v. Steves Sash & Door Co., Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 788; Trustees of Dist. No. 26 v. County Board, etc., Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 1041; Williamson v. Pulliam, Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 799; Miller v. Banks, Tex.Civ.App., 276 S.W. 768; Tsutomu Dyo v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 249 S.W. 541; Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Curry, Tex.Civ.App., 251 S.W. 559; 3 Tex.Jur. 926.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRISSOM, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment granting appellee a divorce. The statement of facts and transcript were filed in the Court of Civil Appeals at Tex-arkana November 16, 1937. The case was transferred to this court by order of the' Supreme Court. The cause was submitted in this court September 30, 1938.

Appellant has failed to file assignments of errors and briefs as required by Court of Civil Appeals Rule 38. No effort to show good cause -for such failure has been made. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed by this court on its own motion. Court of Civil Appeals Rule 38; Du Bose v. Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. of Texas, Tex.Civ.App., 67 S.W.2d 1066; Harding v. Stith, Tex.Civ.App., 88 S.W.2d 528; Sisk v. Steves Sash & Door Co., Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 788; Trustees of Dist. No. 26 v. County Board, etc., Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 1041; Williamson v. Pulliam, Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 799; Miller v. Banks, Tex.Civ.App., 276 S.W. 768; Tsutomu Dyo v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 249 S.W. 541; Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Curry, Tex.Civ.App., 251 S.W. 559; 3 Tex.Jur. 926.

The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 S.W.2d 1025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-armstrong-texapp-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack