Tserpes v. Attorney-General of New York

49 A.D.2d 736, 374 N.Y.S.2d 300
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1975·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 25, 1975 denying petitioners’ motion to quash subpoenas issued by the Attorney-General unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs or disbursements. Subsequent to the denial of the motion to quash, the petitioners complied with the subject subpoenas. Accordingly, there is no controversy for the court to decide, and therefore, the appeal is dismissed as moot (see generally, Delavan v New York, New Haven & Hartford RR. Co., 216 NY 359; Matter of Norton, 158 NY 130). We note, however, that we have examined the merits of the appeal and if the matter had not been rendered moot, we would have affirmed. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Tilzer, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tserpes v. Attorney-General of New York, 49 A.D.2d 736, 374 N.Y.S.2d 300 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

49 A.D.2d 736 (Tserpes v. Attorney-General of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lefkowitz v. Kershenberg
56 A.D.2d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)