Tserpes v. Attorney-General of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tserpes v. Attorney-General of New York

49 A.D.2d 736, 374 N.Y.S.2d 300

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 736 (Tserpes v. Attorney-General of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tserpes v. Attorney-General of New York, 49 A.D.2d 736, 374 N.Y.S.2d 300 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 25, 1975 denying petitioners’ motion to quash subpoenas issued by the Attorney-General unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs or disbursements. Subsequent to the denial of the motion to quash, the petitioners complied with the subject subpoenas. Accordingly, there is no controversy for the court to decide, and therefore, the appeal is dismissed as moot (see generally, Delavan v New York, New Haven & Hartford RR. Co., 216 NY 359; Matter of Norton, 158 NY 130). We note, however, that we have examined the merits of the appeal and if the matter had not been rendered moot, we would have affirmed. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Tilzer, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 25, 1975 denying petitioners’ motion to quash subpoenas issued by the Attorney-General unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs or disbursements. Subsequent to the denial of the motion to quash, the petitioners complied with the subject subpoenas. Accordingly, there is no controversy for the court to decide, and therefore, the appeal is dismissed as moot (see generally, Delavan v New York, New Haven & Hartford RR. Co., 216 NY 359; Matter of Norton, 158 NY 130). We note, however, that we have examined the merits of the appeal and if the matter had not been rendered moot, we would have affirmed. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Tilzer, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 736, 374 N.Y.S.2d 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tserpes-v-attorney-general-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack