Lefkowitz v. Kershenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lefkowitz v. Kershenberg

56 A.D.2d 555, 391 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10564

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 555 (Lefkowitz v. Kershenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lefkowitz v. Kershenberg, 56 A.D.2d 555, 391 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10564 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 26, 1976, directing compliance by respondent-appellant with petitioner-respondent Attorney-General’s investigative subpoena duces tecum, unanimously dismissed, as moot, without costs and without disbursements. Appellant has, since the order appealed from, voluntarily complied fully therewith, as the Attorney-General concedes, and that official has also stated that no prosecution whatever of appellant is contemplated. There is no longer any controversy requiring judicial intervention. (Tserpes v Attorney-General of State of NY, 49 AD2d 736.) Had the matter not been rendered moot, we would [556]*556have affirmed on the merits. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Lane and Markewich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 26, 1976, directing compliance by respondent-appellant with petitioner-respondent Attorney-General’s investigative subpoena duces tecum, unanimously dismissed, as moot, without costs and without disbursements. Appellant has, since the order appealed from, voluntarily complied fully therewith, as the Attorney-General concedes, and that official has also stated that no prosecution whatever of appellant is contemplated. There is no longer any controversy requiring judicial intervention. (Tserpes v Attorney-General of State of NY, 49 AD2d 736.) Had the matter not been rendered moot, we would [556]*556have affirmed on the merits. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Lane and Markewich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 555, 391 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lefkowitz-v-kershenberg-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack