Lefkowitz v. Kershenberg

56 A.D.2d 555, 391 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10564

Opinion

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 26, 1976, directing compliance by respondent-appellant with petitioner-respondent Attorney-General’s investigative subpoena duces tecum, unanimously dismissed, as moot, without costs and without disbursements. Appellant has, since the order appealed from, voluntarily complied fully therewith, as the Attorney-General concedes, and that official has also stated that no prosecution whatever of appellant is contemplated. There is no longer any controversy requiring judicial intervention. (Tserpes v Attorney-General of State of NY, 49 AD2d 736.) Had the matter not been rendered moot, we would [556]*556have affirmed on the merits. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Lane and Markewich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lefkowitz v. Kershenberg, 56 A.D.2d 555, 391 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10564 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

56 A.D.2d 555 (Lefkowitz v. Kershenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tserpes v. Attorney-General of New York
49 A.D.2d 736 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)